Activist Groups Urge Obama to Reject Boy Scout Honor
From Fox News:
Activist groups, including Scouting for All, urge President Obama not to accept the honorary Presidency of the Boy Scouts of America until they stop discriminating.
Scouting for All is a 100% Volunteer 501-(c)(3) Nonprofit Organization. Every dollar donated goes toward our education and advocacy programs, and is tax deductible.
The following Document Contains Significant Excerpts from the Supreme Court's Decision, Dale
U S SUPREME COURT DECISION IN THE CASE OF JAMES DALE V THE BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA
Opinion of the Court, June 28, 2000, by Chief Justice Rehnquist:
The decision limits its decision to the appointment of Scout leaders, and says nothing about the BSA's practice
of dismissing youth members (under the age of 18) from Scouting. he BSA continues to kick out both gay youth and
adults. They also kick out the parent(s) of scouts who are gay adult leaders. They kick out the anyone who is gay
or deny membership to anyone who says he or she is gay. If more gay scouts came out the BSA would lose a large
number of their scouts. It is estimated that 1 out of every 10 children are gay. Their message to gay youth that
they are morally inferior is an abomination and disrespects the world scouting movement's mission, that embraces
all children and the diversity of the human family.
The Supreme Court limits its decision to the right of an organization to limit its membership and says little about
discrimination against homosexuals. "We are not, as we must not be, guided by our views of whether the Boy
Scouts' teachings with respect to homosexual conduct are right or wrong," and "It appears that homosexuality
has gained greater societal acceptance." (pages 18 and 19)
Dissent from the opinion, June 28, 1000, by Justice Stevens, joined by Justice Souter, Justice Ginsburg, and Justice
Breyer: Some key findings that raise serious doubt about the majority decision and will undoubtedly influence future
"But that [New Jersey] law does not 'impos[e] any serious burdens' on BSA's 'collective effort on behalf of
[its] shared goals,'" ... "Nor does it force BSA to communicate any message that it does not wish to
endorse." (page 3)
"[N]either the charter nor the bylaws of the Boy Scouts of America permit the exclusion of any boy."
"It is plain as the light of day that neither one of these principles 'morally straight' and 'clean' says
the slightest thing about
homosexuality." (page 7)
"BSA's bylaws state that it is 'absolutely nonsectarian in its attitude toward ... religious training.' ...
'The BSA does not define what constitutes duty to God or the practice of religion. This is the responsibility of
parents and religious leaders.' In fact, many diverse religious organizations sponsor local Boy Scout troops. ...
Because a number of religious groups do not view homosexuality as immoral or wrong and reject discrimination against
homosexuals, it is exceedingly difficult to believe that BSA nonetheless adopts a single particular religious or
moral philosophy when it comes to sexual orientation." "BSA surely is aware
that some religions do not teach that homosexuality is wrong." (page 9) [A footnote lists United Methodist
Church General Board of Church and Society, Episcopal Church [Bishop of Newark], the Religious Action Center of
Reform Judaism, the United Church Board of Homeland Ministries, and the Unitarian Universalist Association as rejecting
discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.]
[Quoting from a 1978 BSA memorandum on homosexuality] "'In the event that such a law was applicable, it would
be necessary for the Boy Scouts of America to obey it.' ... The 1978 policy was never publicly expressed ... It
remained, in effect a secret Boy Scouts policy." (pages 10-11)
"[T]here is no indication of any shared goal of teaching that homosexuality is incompatible with being 'morally
straight' and 'clean.' Neither BSA's mission statement nor its official membership policy was altered; no Boy Scout
or Scoutmaster Handbook was amended to reflect the policy; no lessons were imparted to Scouts; no change was made
to BSA's policy on limiting discussion of sexual matters; and no effort was made to restrict acceptable religious
affiliations to those that condemn homosexuality. In short, there is no evidence that this view was part of any
collective effort to foster beliefs about homosexuality." (page 14)
"In short, Boy Scouts of America is simply silent on homosexuality. There is no shared goal or collective
effort to foster a belief about homosexuality at all let alone one that is significantly burdened by admitting
homosexuals." (page 23)
"This is an astounding view of the law. I am unaware of any previous instance in which our analysis of the
scope of a constitutional right was determined by looking at what a litigant asserts in his or hier brief and inquiring
no further." (page 25)
'But that [First Amendment] right is not a freedom to discriminate at will, nor is it a right to maintain an exclusionary
membership policy simply out of fear of what the public reaction would be." (page 26)
"Indeed, the past month alone has witnessed some remarkable changes in attitudes about homosexuals."
"That such prejudices are still prevalent and that they have caused serious and tangible harm to countless
members of the class New Jersey seeks to protect are established matters of fact that neither the Boy Scout nor
the Court disputes. That harm can only be aggravated by the creation of a constitutional shield for a policy that
is itself the product of a habitual way of thinking about strangers. As Justice Brandeis so wisely advised, 'we
must be ever on our guard, lest we erect our prejudices into legal principles.'
"If we would guided by the light of reason, we must let our minds be bold." (page 40)