Latest News
Activist Groups Urge Obama to Reject Boy Scout Honor
From Fox News:
Activist groups, including Scouting for All, urge President Obama not to accept the honorary Presidency of the Boy Scouts of America until they stop discriminating.
Scouting for All is a 100% Volunteer 501-(c)(3) Nonprofit Organization. Every dollar donated goes toward our education and advocacy programs, and is tax deductible.
Visitor Count:
|
Petition Count:
|
|
http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,1280,-4702412,00.html
Mont. Court: Gays Due Benefits Others Get
Thursday December 30, 2004 10:16 PM
By SUSAN GALLAGHER
Associated Press Writer
HELENA, Mont. (AP) - A divided Montana Supreme Court declared Thursday that the state constitution's guarantee
of equal protection extends to gays, and ruled that the state university system must offer same-sex
couples the same health benefits available to heterosexual ones.
In a 4-3 decision, the justices struck down the university's policy of denying benefits to employees' gay partners.
The high court said the policy violates the Montana Constitution's guarantee of equal protection because unmarried
heterosexual partners could get the benefit by signing a common-law marriage affidavit, while
unmarried gay partners could not.
The ruling, which reversed a 2002 lower-court decision, did not address the issue of gay marriage, which is barred
under the Montana Constitution.
The case began after the University of Montana refused to let two employees in Missoula buy health insurance for
their lesbian partners, who were not university employees. Carol Snetsinger and Carla Grayson and their partners
sued, joined by the gay-rights group PRIDE.
Leaders of the Republican-controlled Legislature sided with the university system.
The high court said it found no justification for treating unmarried same-sex couples differently from married
ones.
``These two groups, although similarly situated in all respects other than sexual orientation, are not treated
equally and fairly,'' the court said.
In a dissent, Justice Jim Rice said the court had radically altered common-law marriage in Montana, and reached
``the dewpoint of duplicity'' in contending it did not do so.
On the Net:
Ruling:
http://www.lawlibrary.state.mt.us/dscgi/ds.py/View/Collection-10831 PRIDE:
http://gaymontana.com/pride
|